June 2010

You are currently browsing the monthly archive for June 2010.

This December I will have a small solo exhibition of my clay drawings.  By small, I don’t mean insignificant – but, small spatially.  Perhaps compact better describes the space.

I’m planning on six pieces.  Smaller pieces than most of my previous drawn clay work.  The size thing is a real challenge for me.  The dedicated space for the exhibition is about 10′(h)x38′(w), which requires me to think and create differently.

BFA solo installation

~installation: BFA solo exhibition. 1985

I’ve always sort of thought visually in terms of actual size – life size.  As an undergraduate my drawings and paintings never fit into the confines of little illustrated vignettes.  I built and stretched large canvases for my paintings.  Life drawings were, well…life sized.  My BFA solo exhibition included several ‘sofa sized’ paintings.  Except, mine were actual paintings of sofas (and the occasional chair).  In drawing class I refused to be limited by the size of the paper.  A small page could easily be filled with a ‘large as life’ figure.

Thinking small.  Small in size.

I was a student of few financial means – as are many students.  I couldn’t afford large, lovely sheets of paper.  Often, I would scrounge in the trash for the crinkled brown paper that had been used to wrap rolled sheets of the good stuff.  Those crisp, hot pressed, mud colored sheets became my drawing surface.  Though the wrapping paper was less than ideal (and no where near archival), it was big and free.  On the occasion I was able to invest in good paper, it wasn’t uncommon for me to sit in life drawing class with a halved or quartered sheet of paper concentrating on a foot or hand because it filled the page nicely.

Thinking concise.  Concise in character.

~installation: MFA solo exhibition. 1990.

~installation: MFA solo exhibition. 1990.

In graduate school, I was once accused of having “little girl/big art” syndrome.  This comment was flung my direction as I loaded a 160 cubic foot car kiln with the parts to just one installation piece.

Thinking intimate.  Intimate in voice.

Praying for inspiration.

Tags: , , ,


Shortly after graduating with my BFA, I bought the book, Ceramic Science for the Potter, 2nd edition, W.G. Lawrence and R.R. West.  There were plans for graduate school but they were delayed – waited for in-state classification.  So, I took it upon myself to continue some research.  It began with the purchase of this book.

For those who own this book, cracked it open the first time and understood the text with relative ease, I would suggest you to be more science than potter.  For others (like me) who sat down with the intent to uncover the answers to all your ceramic needs only to find yourself looking through the figured illustrations in an effort to connect the dots of the graphs with the appropriate words…focused…trying to really understand.  Yeah, you are more potter than science.


There are a few notes in the margins and a couple dog earred pages in my copy, but for the most part I dust it.  Until recently.

Early in May I found that I was having an absorption issue with my work.  The percentage was too high.  You can fairly accurately calculate the percentage of absorption of any given clay body by weighing a fired piece of clay to the nearest 0.1g.  Then, place the fired piece in a suitable container and boil it for five hours.  Afterward, reweigh the piece.  The percentage of absorption equals the gain in weight divided by the original weight, multiplied by 100.  Yeah, yeah…I didn’t do that.  I knew I had an issue because I had a piece that was weeping or sweating when filled with water.

Now, I needed to find the most immediate solution.  I made a list of possible jumping off points: glaze defects, glaze application, clay body….  As I ran through my list, I narrowed my problem to the clay body.  I’ve used this particular clay for several years without an issue.  This situation was frustrating.

Initially I focused on a glaze defect because I found that not all the pieces were affected.  However, after resolving the defect, I still had an issue – though not with all the pieces.  However, what I did have was the most recently purchased remains of 500 pounds of clay. That would account for the inconsistant results.  It may also point to a change in the recipe of the clay body, or a change in the mining location of a raw material, or…or…or….  Regardless, this wasn’t something I could control.  My solution here would only be a higher firing temperature.  That change would require me to begin from scratch.  Overwhelming thoughts of overwhelmed!!

In the meantime, I sold my clay to a sculptor and bought an old tried and true clay body – one with a tighter more plastic character.  I anticipate good results, but am anxious for the first glaze load.



Not necessarily satisfied with just knowing the clay was the culprit in the demise of several pieces (picture the shard heap topped with dozens of mugs), I dusted off my copy of Ceramic Science for the Potter, 2nd edition, W.G. Lawrence and R.R. West.

Here I discovered two things:
1)  A more probable answer to the clay situation.
2)  I actually understand some of this book (you can say it: geek!).

But, I digress.  So, let’s start with the figured illustrations and work our way back to the appropriate text.  There it is – Fig.2-7, “Effects of firing temperatures on the absorption of plastic, medium plastic and short clay.”  The authors don’t go into a lot of details, the graphics are self-explanatory.  In fact, they meander into instructions for building a Globar thermal furnace for testing – because, of course, any potter with their nose stuck in this book must be planning to do an inordinate amount of differential thermal analysis.  (help me!)  Again, more science than potter.

At any rate, Fig.2-7 reminds me that plastic clay (clay that can be manipulated and still maintain its shape without cracking or sagging) matures at a lower temperature than short clay (clay that is not plastic – see previous definition).  Newly made clay is often refered to as short.  So, I theorized that my new lot of clay wasn’t just new to me, it was quite possibly actual new clay.

You know, I often ask myself why I don’t just draw…like, on paper.  What’s wrong with me?  Don’t answer that.

Tags: , , ,